<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>odd time signatures - Latest Comments in Blogging Divorce: Free Speech or Defamation?</title><link>http://drumsnwhistles.disqus.com/</link><description>life in 19/7 time</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 09:41:39 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Blogging Divorce: Free Speech or Defamation?</title><link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2008/01/10/blogging-divorce-free-speech-or-defamation/#comment-8684185</link><description>Hello Karoli,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Like you, I was initially concerned about the two juxtaposed issues in the Garrido / Krasnansky issue. Should, in fact, the judge issue an order that Mr. K take down the portions of his blog having to do with his wife and marriage. I blogged the case on January 11th. I was concerned because I saw the judge's ex parte order as a prior restraint - a No No to lawyers favoring protection of First Amendment rights. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And then things changed when Mr. K chose to telephone me. Here's what happened next and more commentary on how the Internet can be used inappropriately as a form of harassment. &lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/c46jgq" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://tinyurl.com/c46jgq&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JeanneHannah</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 09:41:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogging Divorce: Free Speech or Defamation?</title><link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2008/01/10/blogging-divorce-free-speech-or-defamation/#comment-72460</link><description>Well, free speech....but I found the content creepy.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz Ditz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 12:04:54 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>