<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>odd time signatures - Latest Comments in Blogs, Conversation and Comments</title><link>http://drumsnwhistles.disqus.com/</link><description>photos, pugs and all that jazz</description><atom:link href="https://drumsnwhistles.disqus.com/blogs_conversation_and_comments/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:04:12 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Blogs, Conversation and Comments</title><link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2006/01/19/blogs-conversation-and-comments/#comment-3777344</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm with you, DnW -- I love the "whole culture of blog," too!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Donna</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:04:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogs, Conversation and Comments</title><link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2006/01/19/blogs-conversation-and-comments/#comment-3777343</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Amy,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This has really been a terrific learning exercise for me.  Thanks for starting the conversation and facilitating it!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;DnW&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">drumsnwhistles</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 17:01:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogs, Conversation and Comments</title><link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2006/01/19/blogs-conversation-and-comments/#comment-3777342</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, Drums, great post!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You noted: "I was defining conversation in terms of one-with-one interaction, but a blog is a one-with-many conversation, with comments amplifying the 'one' to 'many' voices."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;...And that's why I consider weblogs to be a type of "conversational media" -- which is media that leverages mass communication to allow the audience to converse directly with the author and with each other.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We're generally used to thinking about conversation in terms of two people or a small group, but we now have large-scale and usually public conversations happening via conversational media. I find this trend fascinating.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm glad you've come to embrace a broader view of what a conversation can be.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;- Amy Gahran&lt;br&gt;  &lt;a href="http://RightConversation.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="RightConversation.com"&gt;RightConversation.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;  &lt;a href="http://Contentious.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="Contentious.com"&gt;Contentious.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amy Gahran</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2006 16:38:20 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>