<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>odd time signatures - Latest Comments in Tracking the Swarm</title><link>http://drumsnwhistles.disqus.com/</link><description>life in 19/7 time</description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 21:46:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Tracking the Swarm</title><link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2008/11/15/tracking-the-swarm/#comment-3796095</link><description>No, I didn't :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karoli</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 21:46:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tracking the Swarm</title><link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2008/11/15/tracking-the-swarm/#comment-3795966</link><description>you missed my point  :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tweetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 21:25:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tracking the Swarm</title><link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2008/11/15/tracking-the-swarm/#comment-3795798</link><description>Well, I disagree. When I tracked, I tracked users as well as terms. Was  &lt;br&gt;easy enough to choose to track users I wanted to read no matter what and  &lt;br&gt;scan the timeline when I felt like it for other things.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So now I'm stuck having to follow back and block the idiots, something I  &lt;br&gt;never dealt with before.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karoli</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 21:02:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tracking the Swarm</title><link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2008/11/15/tracking-the-swarm/#comment-3795410</link><description>@karoli said: "If you just send out self-promoting links and aren't interested in conversation when u follow, I not only won't follow, I will block."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If one has access to the firehose, blocking is a myth. Twitter had many reasons for turning off the firehose. They had many reasons for turning off track. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With new architecture &amp; ToS, many reasons will be absent &amp; your blocking will be enforced :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tweetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 20:22:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tracking the Swarm</title><link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2008/11/15/tracking-the-swarm/#comment-3795066</link><description>Thanks, I'll correct that in the post.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karoli</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 19:42:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tracking the Swarm</title><link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2008/11/15/tracking-the-swarm/#comment-3794911</link><description>time correction: @scribeofflight 1st tweet at 02:35:33 EST</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tweetip</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 19:24:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tracking the Swarm</title><link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2008/11/15/tracking-the-swarm/#comment-3790702</link><description>Yes. They have said it's a scaling problem. It's really more about forming a business model around a very valuable stream of information, as they indicated in September at BearHug camp in an interview with Steve Gillmor.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Karoli</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 11:54:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tracking the Swarm</title><link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2008/11/15/tracking-the-swarm/#comment-3790475</link><description>What? Unicorns? NOOOOO!!!! But I love unicorns :)&lt;br&gt;It is amazing the nuances we will bring to ensure we disagree. And as I've said repeatedly over the past two days - I don't think we really disagree.&lt;br&gt;The power of your anecdotes is obvious and compelling - and they are, in fact, powered by a scope of trackable data that is very large. But, as I've said on multiple occasions, I agree that the wider the scope of the trackable data the greater the potential value. &lt;br&gt;My point isn't that less scope is good, it is that you can achieve value (discovery and participation in real time - mobile or otherwise) with a limited trackable scope. I don't suggest we should abandon the effort to have services/networks "open up" and share the full data. &lt;br&gt;All I suggest is that we open up the track community to anyone working on solving the problem(s) of real time information discovery and participation. Make it inclusive - and not bear hug anyone who says - "hey we can do something here, even if we don't have the fire-hose".&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So we agree - but we don't. I'd love to be involved in the track community - but since I don't have a fire-hose of data to create solutions on... I guess I can't. I believe that my non-track limited information discovery and participation solutions will help the track community gain the leverage required to get the services to "open up". Hope that is enough.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">briantroy</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 11:31:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tracking the Swarm</title><link>http://www.drumsnwhistles.com/2008/11/15/tracking-the-swarm/#comment-3790119</link><description>Did Twitter ever explain why they turned off tracking?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- Amy</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Amy Gahran</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 10:42:55 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>